Social-Cognitive Perspective Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Social-Cognitive attitude - Essay ExampleIt emphasizes the role of biology and gene transmission across generations to explain current behaviors.Social Learning Perspective Stresses the importance of unique experiences in family, school, community, etc. According to this viewpoint, we learn behaviors through observing and mimicking the behavior of people around us.Social-Cognitive Perspective demonstrates an information processing representative of social behavior, where we notice, interpret, and judge the behavior of new(prenominal)s. New experiences may either be assimilated (using already held beliefs to interpret the event), or accommodated (which involves changing existing beliefs in response to the event.) By understanding the processing of information, we canful better understand how patterns of thoughts impact behavior.One of the most important features of the social complex body partist perspective is that much attention is given to the regulate of the specific dialogu es on the possible meanings. For example, to do justice to the self-understanding of the believing community, we cannot avoid the language of revelation.For practical theological discourse about revelation, this means that we have to necessitate the various dialogues in which different sets of criteria function. We encounter other branches of theology and engage in conversations with the social science and also connect with the church and the society in the process. A second important aspect of a social constructionist perspective is the emphasis on the performative dimension of language. Instead of asking what revelation is, what content is revealed, and how we can evaluate competing claims to revelation, a social constructionist practical theology will delve into what it means when someone invokes the language of revelation. This is not to be confused with relativism. The psychodynamic perspective originated from Sigmund Freuds depth psychology and lays emphasis on the unconsciou s components such as conflicts and instinctual energies. psychodynamics is a general term which incorporates all the components but keeps the unconscious as a primary element. The precedent why scientifically oriented psychologists dismiss this perspective is its emphasis on the unconscious which can neither be observed nor measured.A language-centered perspective toward the social-rhetorical construction of knowledge can be constructed by juxtaposing Kenneth Burkes philosophy of language with Thomas S. Kuhns philosophy of science. Kuhns Structure of Scientific Revolutions has had a wider academic influence than any other single book of the last twenty years (Gutting v). In particular, Kuhn is honored as father of current social constructionist thought in a descriptor of disciplines (Bruffee 779). Therefore, a cross-fertilization of these two important thinkers viewpoints should be a fruitful endeavor.Recently, J.E. McGuire and Trevor Melia have argued against opinions regarding r ampant rhetoricism in rhetoric of science scholarship (empty words). They argue that while the form and validation processes of science display rhetorical qualities, the content of scientific discourse ( which scientific language is about) is ontologically different from that of other forms of discourse, and, hence, in an important sense, science qua science is non-rhetorical (Some 97). Those who describe rhetoric as epistemic emphasize that language embodies and generates knowledge that is relative to specific